## You are here

Homenon-existence of universal series convergence criterion

## Primary tabs

# non-existence of universal series convergence criterion

There exist many criteria for examining the convergence and divergence of series with positive terms (see e.g. determining series convergence). They all are sufficient but not necessary. It has also been asked whether there would be any criterion which were both sufficient and necessary. The famous mathematician Niels Henrik Abel took this question under consideration and proved the

###### Theorem.

Proof. Let’s assume that there is a sequence (1) having the both properties. We infer that the series $\frac{1}{\varrho_{1}}\!+\!\frac{1}{\varrho_{2}}\!+\!\frac{1}{\varrho_{3}}\!+\ldots$ is divergent because $\lim_{{n\to\infty}}(\varrho_{n}\!\cdot\!\frac{1}{\varrho_{n}})\neq 0$. The theorem on slower divergent series guarantees us another divergent series $s_{1}\!+\!s_{2}\!+\!s_{3}\!+\ldots$ such that the ratio $s_{n}\colon\!\frac{1}{\varrho_{n}}=\varrho_{n}s_{n}$ tends to the limit $0$ as $n\to\infty$. But this limit result concerning the series $s_{1}\!+\!s_{2}\!+\!s_{3}\!+\ldots$ should mean, according to our assumption, that the series is convergent. The contradiction shows that the theorem holds.

# References

- 1 Ernst Lindelöf: Differentiali- ja integralilasku ja sen sovellutukset III.2. Mercatorin Kirjapaino Osakeyhtiö. Helsinki (1940).

## Mathematics Subject Classification

40A05*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff
- Corrections